Contested v. Uncontested Divorce
Divorce is fairly common in the United States, with over half of marriages ending in divorce. When a couple decides that divorce is the best path for them, they have several different options for the type of divorce that they are going to pursue. The two most common are contested and uncontested. Though they sound similar, they are opposite from one another. At Arenson Law Group, PC, we believe it is important for anyone in Cedar Rapids who is considering divorce to understand the differences between these two types of divorce so they can choose the option that is best for them.
Key Differences between Contested and Uncontested Divorce
There are key differences between an uncontested and a contested divorce, but the most basic one to understand is that spouses agree on divorce terms in an uncontested divorce, whereas they disagree on critical terms in a contested divorce. Some of the other differences include:
- Generally less time spent finalizing an uncontested divorce
- Generally more money spent finalizing a contested divorce
- Contested divorces tend to involve more fighting and are less harmonious
- Contested divorces might require the use of arbiters
A judge typically rules in a contested divorce, whereas agreements are made between spouses and their representation in an uncontested one
These differences are important for anyone considering divorce to understand, as they can help you determine which option is best for your situation.
Discuss Your Divorce Options with an Attorney in Cedar Rapids
If you live in Cedar Rapids and are thinking about getting a divorce, the attorneys of Arenson Law Group, PC, can help you decide which option is right for you. Contact our offices today at (319) 363-8199 to discuss your situation with us.